Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 4 of 4 (0.16 seconds)
Dawn Mathews vs The Tahsildar on 18 November, 2014 cites

Jalaja Dileep vs The Revenue Divisional Officer on 20 March, 1972

6. The petitioner relies on Ext.P9 report of the Village Officer. This would clearly indicate the nature of the land. It is also seen that there are several buildings in and around the above property. Therefore, I am of the view that this is a fit case where permission can be granted to utilise the land for other purposes in terms of Clause 6 of the Kerala Land Utilisation Order. Therefore, the petitioner shall approach the District Collector, Thrissur within one week from the date of receipt of copy of this judgment. Thereafter, based on such request permission shall be granted to the petitioner within a further period of four weeks. It is made clear that these writ petitions are disposed without prejudice to the petitioners' right to establish any claim based on Jalaja Dileep's case (supra). No costs.
Kerala High Court Cites 8 - Cited by 415 - Full Document

The Revenue Div. Officer Fort Kochi &Ors vs Jalaja Dileep on 7 August, 2014

3. Learned counsel for the petitioners submit that WP(C).No.27952/2014-T. 2 they are entitled for a declaration from this Court in the light of the dictum laid down by this Court in Revenue Divisional Officer, Fort Kochi and others v. Jalaja Dileep and another (2014 (1) KLT 161), to effectuate changes in the Basic Tax Register as the properties have been reclaimed long before the enactment of the Kerala Conservation of Paddy Land and Wet Land Act, 2008 (for short the "Act 28 of 2008"). It is further submitted, without prejudice to the petitioners' right as above, for seeking a declaration, the petitioners are entitled to convert or utilise the above land for any other purposes other than for cultivating food crops, as these properties are no longer fit for any cultivation.
Supreme Court - Daily Orders Cites 0 - Cited by 8 - Full Document
1