Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 8 of 8 (0.21 seconds)
V. Veerarajan & Ors vs Government Of Tamil Nadu & Ors on 14 January, 1987 cites

Ram Avtar Sharma & Ors. Etc vs State Of Haryana And Anr. Etc on 11 April, 1985

In the case of Ram Awtar Sharma & Ors. v. State of Haryana & Anr., [1985] 3 SCC 189 the ratio in the Bombay Union of Journalists' case has been reiterated. Learned Attorney General for the State of Tamil Nadu submitted that the statute authorises the State to take a prima facie view of the matter for the purpose of ascertain- ing whether it was a fit case wherein exercise of jurisdic- tion under section 10(1) read with section 12(5) of the Act was called for and a reference was warranted. The State Government in declining to make a reference in the present case has kept itself within the limit set by law as deline- ated by this Court.
Supreme Court of India Cites 13 - Cited by 221 - D A Desai - Full Document

Workmen Of Syndicate Bank, Madras vs Government Of India And Anr. on 29 October, 1984

"We would therefore have ordinarily allowed the appeal and set aside the judgments of the learned Single Judge and the Division Bench of the High Court and directed the State Government to make a reference of the industrial dispute between the appellants and the 3rd respondent. But Dr. Chitale appearing on behalf of the 3rd respondent urged that there might be some other relevant grounds which may still be required to be considered by the State Government before deciding whether to make a reference or not and the case should therefore go back to the State Government to reconsider the question in the. same manner in which this Court directed the State Government to reconsider in the Workmen of Syndicate Bank case (supra). But this is a case in which more than 7 years have elapsed since the appellants were dismissed from service and they are still nowhere near a reference. We would therefore set aside the judgments passed by the learned Single Judge and the Division Bench and direct the State government to reconsider the matter without taking into account the aforesaid irrelevant ground and come to a decision within a period of 30 days from the date of receipt of the copy of this order whether it would make a reference of the industrial dispute to the Labour Court. We would keep the appeal pending before us and as soon as the decision is reached by the State Government, which of course should be within a period of 30 days from the date of receipt of the copy of this order by the State Government, intimation of such decision shall be given to the Court so that the Court can then consider whether the decision reached by the State Government is legally justi- fied or not. We are informed that V. Kondiah the 2nd appel- lant has already settled the dispute with the 3rd respondent and therefore the question of making a reference of the dispute will have to be considered by the State Government only in regard to the remaining 6 appellants."
Supreme Court of India Cites 0 - Cited by 24 - Full Document

Bombay Union Of Journalists & Ors vs The State Of Bombay & Anr on 19 December, 1963

In the case of Ram Awtar Sharma & Ors. v. State of Haryana & Anr., [1985] 3 SCC 189 the ratio in the Bombay Union of Journalists' case has been reiterated. Learned Attorney General for the State of Tamil Nadu submitted that the statute authorises the State to take a prima facie view of the matter for the purpose of ascertain- ing whether it was a fit case wherein exercise of jurisdic- tion under section 10(1) read with section 12(5) of the Act was called for and a reference was warranted. The State Government in declining to make a reference in the present case has kept itself within the limit set by law as deline- ated by this Court.
Supreme Court of India Cites 15 - Cited by 123 - P B Gajendragadkar - Full Document
1