Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 16 (0.38 seconds)

Dr. Harsih Kumar Khurana vs Joginder Singh . on 7 September, 2021

In a recent judgment in Dr. Harish Kumar Khurana Vs Joginder Singh and others, 2022 ACJ I, the Hon'ble Supreme Court held that the hospital and doctors are required to exercise sufficient care in treating the patient in all circumstances. However, in an unfortunate case death may occur. It will be necessary that sufficient material of medical evidence should be available before the adjudicating authority to arrive at a conclusion that the death is due to medical ::: Downloaded on - 04/12/2023 20:35:30 :::CIS 20 negligence. Every death of a patient it cannot, on the face of it be considered to be medical negligence.
Supreme Court of India Cites 5 - Cited by 61 - A S Bopanna - Full Document

Jacob Mathew vs State Of Punjab & Anr on 5 August, 2005

"37. We find from a reading of the order of the Commission that it proceeded on the basis that whatever had been al- leged in the complaint by the respondent was in fact the in- violable truth even though it remained unsupported by any evidence. As already observed in Jacob Mathew case [(2005) 6 SCC 1 : 2005 SCC (Cri) 1369] the onus to prove medical negligence lies largely on the claimant and that this onus can be discharged by leading cogent evidence. A mere aver- ment in a complaint which is denied by the other side can, by no stretch of imagination, be said ::: Downloaded on - 04/12/2023 20:35:30 :::CIS 13 to be evidence by which the case of the complainant can be said to be proved. It is the obligation of the complainant to provide the facta probanda as well as the facta probantia."
Supreme Court of India Cites 25 - Cited by 1754 - R C Lahoti - Full Document

Haji Mohammad Ekramul Haq vs The State Of West Bengal on 16 December, 1958

19. The report submitted by an expert does not go in evidence automatically. He is to be examined as a witness in rt court and has to face cross- examination. This Court in the case of Hazi Mohammad Ekramul Haq v. State of W.B. concurred with the finding of the High Court in not placing any reliance upon the evidence of an expert witness on the ground that his evidence was merely an opinion unsupported by any reasons."
Supreme Court of India Cites 7 - Cited by 56 - J L Kapur - Full Document
1   2 Next