Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 20 (0.23 seconds)Delhi State Industrial Development ... vs Shri Prakash Sethi And Anr. on 25 January, 2007
30. PW4 Ct Chand Ram is the one and only injured herein. It is
alleged by the prosecution that the accused tore his uniform and
State Vs. Akash Sethi Page no. 13/18
caused him simple hurt by pushing his motorcycle. Therefore his
testimony holds a significant value for the decision of the case.
About the action of accused which caused injuries to him, PW4 de-
posed that the accused pushed his bike by leg blow, he fell and that
accused also tore his uniform. PW2 Yoginder Giri deposed that Ct
Chand Ram was pushed onto the road by the accused. However,
PW4 Ct Chand Ram himself did not depose anything about it. The
careful perusal of his testimony clearly shows that PW4 has not de-
posed about any direct of accused on his person. It seems highly
unlikely that the main witness and the victim would not remember
the act of him being pushed by the accused but the eye witness
PW2 remembers that injured was pushed by accused.