Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 13 (0.22 seconds)Section 302 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Shivaji Sahebrao Bobade & Anr vs State Of Maharashtra on 27 August, 1973
29. Then as to the recovery of knife, the same is doubtful in view of the law laid down by the Supreme Court in Shivaji Sahabrao Bobade & Anr. v. State of Maharashtra(1973) 2 SCC 793. Neither there is any independent witness nor compliance of law has been shown-with respect to the disclosure made by the police. No independent witness was produced at the trial to prove the recovery.
Section 34 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
State Of Chhattisgarh vs Bal Govind 11 Wpc/2062/2018 Ashok Das ... on 10 October, 2018
32. Consequently, this appeal succeeds and is allowed. The judgment and and order dated 06.02.2019 passed by Shri Manoj Kumar Singh-III, learned Additional Sessions Judge-VII, Firozabad in Sessions Trial No. 310 of 2012 (State Vs. Ramakant Baghel and Devendra Kumar Baghel alias Deva), arising out of Case Crime No. 516 of 2011, under Sections 302, 201 I.P.C., Police Station Shikohabad, District Firozabad, is set aside. The appellants are acquitted from the charges of offence. Since both the appellants have already been released on bail, as such, their sureties and bonds shall stand discharged subject to compliance of Section 437A Cr.P.C.
Rambraksh @ Jalim vs State Of Chhattisgarh on 12 May, 2016
22. Then in Rambraksh alias Jalim Vs. State of Chhatisgarh : (2016) 12 SCC 251, the Supreme Court has further observed as below:
Section 313 in The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 [Entire Act]
Raju @ Rajendra Prasad vs The State Of Rajasthan on 19 September, 2022
19. Learned counsel for the appellants has also relied upon the judgment of Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Raju @ Rajendra Prasad Vs. State of Rajasthan : Laws (SC)-2022-9-83. In that, it has been observed:
Babu vs State Of Kerala on 11 August, 2010
In Babu v. State of Kerala, (2010) 9 SCC 189, the Supreme Court observed as under :
Krishnan vs State Represented By Inspector Of ... on 8 May, 2008
In Krishnan v. State [(2008) 15 SCC 430], this Court after considering a large number of its earlier judgments observed as follows : (SCC p. 435, para 15)
'15. ... This Court in a series of decisions has consistently held that when a case rests upon circumstantial evidence, such evidence must satisfy the following tests: