Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 8 of 8 (0.22 seconds)
State Of Jharkhand Th Dist Pro vs Dist Comsumer Forum.Palamau on 17 November, 2011 cites

Regional Provident Fund Commissioner vs Shiv Kumar Joshi on 14 December, 1999

9. Learned counsel for the Respondents has cited an order dated-18.11.2010, passed by this Court in W.P. (S) No. 3144 of 2003 (The State of Jharkhand through the District Provident Fund Officer, Palamau-versus-The District Consumer Forum, Palamau and others, wherein, relying upon the judgment of the Hon'ble Apex Court in the case of Regional Provident Fund Commissioner Vs. Shiv Kumar Joshi (Supra), the Division Bench of this Court dismissed the writ petition of the State.
Supreme Court of India Cites 20 - Cited by 210 - Full Document

State Of Orissa vs Divisional Manager, Lic & Anr on 18 March, 1996

4. Learned counsel for the respondent-employee submitted that the judgment of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of State of Orissa (Supra) has been considered by the Supreme Court in a subsequent judgment in the case of Regional Provident Fund Commissioner Vs. Shiv Kumar Joshi reported in AIR 2000 SC 331. The Hon'ble Supreme Court after considering the provisions of the Section 2 (1) (d) and 2 (1) (o) as also the provisions of Employees' Provident Funds and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952 held that under the said provision even when a fund was managed by the authority of the State even then employee is getting the services rendered on payment, though, he himself was not paying any consideration for the services but is paid by the State Government and the Act nowhere provides that for falling in the definition of "Service for consideration" one is required to pay the contribution himself and it cannot be through the employer. Since in said case which was under
Supreme Court of India Cites 5 - Cited by 25 - K Ramaswamy - Full Document
1