Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 11 (0.45 seconds)

Nadeem Ahmed vs State (Govt. Of Nct Of Delhi) And Anr on 11 April, 2022

16. Likewise, in Naeem Ahmed Alias Naim Ahmad vs. Govt. of NCT of Delhi, 2024 SCC OnLine SC 220, the Hon'ble Supreme Court granted bail to the accused from whom commercial quantity of contraband was recovered, having regard to his custody of 01 year and 11 months, the fact that the accused had no criminal antecedents and that the conclusion of trial would take time. The relevant paras of the decision reads as under:
Delhi High Court - Orders Cites 8 - Cited by 0 - C D Singh - Full Document

Jitender @ Bantu vs Govt Of Nct Of Delhi on 8 November, 2016

12. It may be noted that recovery was made in the case at about 1:25 pm in the month of April during broad day light but no independent witnesses was joined. The justification given in the charge-sheet as well as in the status report is that efforts were made to join the independent witnesses but no one was ready for the same but insofar as absence of videography and photography is concerned, no justification for the same is forthcoming. A coordinate bench of this Court in Bantu (supra) has observed that though, sufficiency of explanation as regards lack of videography and photography is to be tested during the course of trial, however, in the absence of any independent witnesses in support of recovery, lack of videography and photography is a relevant factor while considering applications for grant of bail as the same cast a doubt over the very fulcrum of the case. The relevant paragraphs from the said decision are as under:
Delhi High Court Cites 4 - Cited by 0 - S P Garg - Full Document
1   2 Next