Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 11 (0.24 seconds)
Faimuddin Khan Saifi @ Faheem Khan & Ors vs The State (Govt Of Nct Delhi) & Anr on 3 November, 2016 cites

State Of Maharashtra Trhu Cbi vs Vikram Anantrai Doshi & Ors on 19 September, 2014

9. It is settled law that the inherent power of the High Court under Section 482 Cr.P.C. should be used sparingly. The Hon'ble Apex Court in the case of State of Maharashtra through CBI v. Vikram Anatrai Doshi and Ors. MANU/SC/0842/2014 and in the case of Inder Singh Goswami v. State of Uttaranchal MANU/SC/0808/2009 has observed that powers under Section 482 Cr.P.C. must be exercised sparingly, carefully and with great caution. Only when the Court comes to the conclusion that there would be manifest injustice or there Crl.M.C. 2379/2016 Page 5 of 8 would be abuse of the process of the Court if such power is not exercised, Court would quash the proceedings.
Supreme Court of India Cites 25 - Cited by 1061 - D Misra - Full Document

B.S. Joshi & Ors vs State Of Haryana & Anr on 13 March, 2003

In the case of B.S. Joshi and others v. State of Haryana and another 2003 (4) SCC 675 the Hon'ble Apex Court observed that even though the provisions of Section 320 Cr.P.C. would not apply to such offences which are not compoundable, it did not limit or affect the powers under Section 482 Cr.P.C. The Hon'ble Apex Court laid down that if for the purpose of securing the ends of justice, quashing of FIR becomes necessary, section 320 Cr.P.C. would not be a bar to the exercise of power of quashing. In the nutshell, the Hon'ble Apex Court justified the exercise of powers under Section 482 Cr.P.C. to quash the proceedings to secure the ends of justice in view of the special facts and circumstances of the case, even where the offences were non- compoundable.
Supreme Court of India Cites 20 - Cited by 11910 - H K Sema - Full Document
1   2 Next