Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 14 (0.22 seconds)

M/S Isha Marbles vs Bihar State Electricity Board on 3 February, 1995

2.4 In response to the above, the petitioner addressed letter dated 25.11.2004 to respondent No. 1 claiming that in view of the judgment of the Apex Court in the case of Isha Marbles v. Bihar State Electricity Board, and some other judgments, the respondent Company could not insist upon the petitioner to pay up the demands due from the previous owner as a condition precedent for the release of fresh connection in view of the auction purchase.
Supreme Court of India Cites 23 - Cited by 194 - S Mohan - Full Document

Ahmedabad Electricity Co. Ltd vs Gujarat Inns. Pvt. Ltd. And Ors on 16 March, 2004

During the course of hearing, two decisions namely Isha Marbles v. Bihar State Electricity Board and Anr. and Ahmedabad Electricity Co. Ltd. v. Gujarat Inns Pvt. Ltd. and Ors. [2004 (2) GLH 691] are brought to the notice of this Court. These decisions clearly hold that the liability cannot be fastened on the auction purchasers/third party. The petitioner is auction purchaser/third party in this case, therefore, Ahmedabad Electricity Co. Ltd cannot seek recovery of electricity dues from the petitioner. The contention that the property has been purchased subject to all risks would not be applicable in this case in view of the legal position discussed above.
Supreme Court of India Cites 3 - Cited by 51 - Full Document
1   2 Next