Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 60 (0.88 seconds)

R. N. Nanjundappa vs T. Thimmiah & Anr on 8 December, 1971

The Court adverted to the theme of constitutionalism in a system established on the rule of law, expanded meaning given to the doctrine of equality in general and equality in the matter of employment in particular, multifaceted problems including the one relating to unwarranted fiscal burden on the public exchequer created on account of the directions given by the High Courts and this Court for regularisation of the services of persons appointed on purely temporary or ad hoc basis or engaged on daily wages or as casual labourers, referred to about three dozen judgments including R. N. Nanjundappa v T. Thimmiah, Daily Rated Casual Labour v Union of 64 India , Bhagwati Prasad v Delhi State Mineral Development Corpn.65, Dharwad Distt.
Supreme Court of India Cites 10 - Cited by 732 - A N Ray - Full Document

South Central Railway Employees ... vs B. Yashodabai And Ors. on 14 August, 2002

18. To be fair to her, Ms. Chatterjee did not, at any point of time, dispute the applicability, to the facts of the applicants before us, of the decision in Jaggo. Her initial submission was, however, that the decision in Jaggo was per incuriam, as it was contrary to earlier decisions rendered by the Supreme Court, of Larger Benches. Subsequently, on her attention being drawn to the fact that the Supreme Court had held that in South Central Railway Employees Co-op Credit Society Employees Union v B. Yashodabai9 that the High Court could not declare a judgment of the Supreme Court to be 9 (2015) 2 SCC 727 Signature Not Verified W.P.(C) 11693/2019 and other connected matters Page 9 of 85 Digitally Signed By:AJIT KUMAR Signing Date:16.04.2025 13:49:32 per incuriam, Ms. Chatterjee slightly modified her stand to state that, as earlier judgments of the Supreme Court, which were binding precedents, had elucidated the law contrary to the elucidation which is to be found in Jaggo, those earlier decisions would have to be followed. There can be no doubt about the fact that Ms. Chatterjee was clearly entitled to raise the said contention. We would, however, proceed to address its merits, by and by.
Andhra HC (Pre-Telangana) Cites 35 - Cited by 19 - Full Document
1   2 3 4 5 6 Next