Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 8 of 8 (0.22 seconds)Section 19 in The Limitation Act, 1963 [Entire Act]
Section 21 in The Limitation Act, 1963 [Entire Act]
The Limitation Act, 1963
The Land Acquisition Act, 1894
Lakshumanan Chetty And Ors. vs R.M.K.S. Sadayappa Chetty And Ors. on 15 August, 1918
In Lakshumanan Chetty v. Sadayappa Chetty 48 Ind. Cas. 179 : (1918) M. W. N. 877 : 8 L. W. 594 : 35 M. L. J. 571 : 25 M. L. T. 371. a Bench of this Court held that an acknowledgment of a debt made by a Receiver appointed by the Court on behalf of a firm under dissolution is a valid acknowledgment saving limitation by reason of the provisions of Section 19 of the Limitation Act as he was an agent authorized to make the acknowledgment.
Section 24 in The Limitation Act, 1963 [Entire Act]
Oudh Bihari Pande And Anr. vs Mahabir Sahi And Ors. on 31 May, 1909
In Oudh Bihari Pande v. Mahabir Sahai 2 Ind. Cas. 524 : 31 A. 590 : 6 A. L. J. 836. the only question decided was that, because the part payment by sale in execution of the judgment debtor's property did not appear in the handwriting of the judgment-debtor, it could not save limitation.
1