Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 4 of 4 (0.24 seconds)State Of Punjab And Another vs Shamlal Murari & Anr on 6 October, 1975
speaking for the court in State of Punjab v Shamlal
Murari, AIR 1976 Supreme court 1177, that we must
always remember that procedural law is not to be a
3 of 7
::: Downloaded on - 26-02-2018 06:04:01 :::
CR No.6637 of 2017 (O&M) - 4 -
tyrant but a servant, not an obstruction but an aid to
justice. It has been wisely observed that procedural
prescriptions are the hand maid and not the mistress, a
lubricant, not a resistant in the administration of
justice. Where the non-compliance, the 'procedural' will
thwart fair' hearing of prejudice doing of parties, the
rule is mandatory. But, grammar apart, if the breach
can be corrected without injury to a just disposal of the
case, we should not enthrone a regulatory requirement
into a dominent desideretum. After all, courts are to do
justice, not to wreck this end product on technicalities."
Jasvir Singh & Anr vs Jaspal Singh on 30 March, 2015
5 of 7
::: Downloaded on - 26-02-2018 06:04:02 :::
CR No.6637 of 2017 (O&M) - 6 -
Reference has also been made to the judgment of this Court
dated 30.03.2015, titled as "Jasvir Singh and another vs Jaspal Singh"
Article 227 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
1