Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 11 (0.78 seconds)Section 406 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Section 419 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Section 420 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Section 467 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Section 468 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Nikhil Merchant vs C.B.I. & Anr on 20 August, 2008
Thus, in view of the well settled principles of law as laid down by the Hon'ble Apex Court reported in 2003(4) SCC 675 (B.S. Joshi Vs. State of Haryana), J.T. 2008(9) SC 192 (Nikhil Merchant Vs. Central Bureau of investigation and another), (2012) 10 SCC 303 (Gian Singh Vs. State of Punjab), (2014) 9 SCC 653 (Yogendra Yadav and others Vs. State of Jharkhand) and also (2014) 6 SCC 466 (Narendra Singh Vs. State of Punjab), and in view of the settlement agreement dated 27.01.2023, the First Information Report dated 28.02.2022 registered as Case Crime No. 58 of 2022 under Sections 419, 420, 467, 468, 471, 406 IPC, P.S. Lalpur/Pandeypur, District Varanasi is hereby quashed.
Gian Singh vs State Of Punjab & Anr on 24 September, 2012
Thus, in view of the well settled principles of law as laid down by the Hon'ble Apex Court reported in 2003(4) SCC 675 (B.S. Joshi Vs. State of Haryana), J.T. 2008(9) SC 192 (Nikhil Merchant Vs. Central Bureau of investigation and another), (2012) 10 SCC 303 (Gian Singh Vs. State of Punjab), (2014) 9 SCC 653 (Yogendra Yadav and others Vs. State of Jharkhand) and also (2014) 6 SCC 466 (Narendra Singh Vs. State of Punjab), and in view of the settlement agreement dated 27.01.2023, the First Information Report dated 28.02.2022 registered as Case Crime No. 58 of 2022 under Sections 419, 420, 467, 468, 471, 406 IPC, P.S. Lalpur/Pandeypur, District Varanasi is hereby quashed.
Yogendra Yadav & Ors vs State Of Jharkhand & Anr on 21 July, 2014
Thus, in view of the well settled principles of law as laid down by the Hon'ble Apex Court reported in 2003(4) SCC 675 (B.S. Joshi Vs. State of Haryana), J.T. 2008(9) SC 192 (Nikhil Merchant Vs. Central Bureau of investigation and another), (2012) 10 SCC 303 (Gian Singh Vs. State of Punjab), (2014) 9 SCC 653 (Yogendra Yadav and others Vs. State of Jharkhand) and also (2014) 6 SCC 466 (Narendra Singh Vs. State of Punjab), and in view of the settlement agreement dated 27.01.2023, the First Information Report dated 28.02.2022 registered as Case Crime No. 58 of 2022 under Sections 419, 420, 467, 468, 471, 406 IPC, P.S. Lalpur/Pandeypur, District Varanasi is hereby quashed.
Narendra Chaudhary vs State Of Punjab on 23 August, 2022
Thus, in view of the well settled principles of law as laid down by the Hon'ble Apex Court reported in 2003(4) SCC 675 (B.S. Joshi Vs. State of Haryana), J.T. 2008(9) SC 192 (Nikhil Merchant Vs. Central Bureau of investigation and another), (2012) 10 SCC 303 (Gian Singh Vs. State of Punjab), (2014) 9 SCC 653 (Yogendra Yadav and others Vs. State of Jharkhand) and also (2014) 6 SCC 466 (Narendra Singh Vs. State of Punjab), and in view of the settlement agreement dated 27.01.2023, the First Information Report dated 28.02.2022 registered as Case Crime No. 58 of 2022 under Sections 419, 420, 467, 468, 471, 406 IPC, P.S. Lalpur/Pandeypur, District Varanasi is hereby quashed.