Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 6 of 6 (1.24 seconds)
Chief Divisional Manager, Bharat ... vs State Of Kerala, Rep. By The District ... on 4 March, 2003
cites
Section 30 in The Land Acquisition Act, 1894 [Entire Act]
Section 106 in Kerala Land Reforms Act, 1963 [Entire Act]
The Land Acquisition Act, 1894
Union Of India vs Ajit Singh And Ors. on 18 August, 1986
In Union of India v. S. Ajit Singh (AIR 1987 Delhi 151) where the lease was for 99 years it was held that landlord is entitled to only 25% of the compensation and tenant is entitled to 75%.
Bhagwan Dattatraya Budukh vs Vishwanath Pandharinath Joshi And Ors. on 26 July, 1978
LJ 587) Bombay High Court in Bhagwan Dattatraya Budukh v. Viswanath Pandharinath Joshi and Ors. (AIR 1979 Bom. 1.). In this case only part of the tenant's premises is acquired and there is no evidence to show the exact rent for the part of the premises. Here, the entire business of the tenant is not closed due to acquisition. He can continue the business in the balance part of the leased land though with some inconveniences.
1