Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 14 (1.92 seconds)Section 166 in The Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 [Entire Act]
Section 168 in The Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 [Entire Act]
Section 170 in The Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 [Entire Act]
Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd. vs Chintharbhai Sibabhai, Guardian Of ... on 10 October, 2002
10.1 In Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd. vs.
Chintharbhai Sibabhai, 2003 (1) GLH 394, the claimants
had filed petition under Section 166 and also an
application under Section 140 on 11.4.1997. Before the
Tribunal passed any order on application under Section
140 of the Act and during pendency of the application
under Section 166 of the Act, the claimant filed
application under Section 163-A of the Act on 12.7.2000.
The Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd vs Hansrajbhai V. Kodala & Ors on 4 April, 2001
The said application was filed in view of the
decision of the Apex Court in Oriental Insurance Co.
Ltd. vs. Hansrajbhai V. Kodala (supra) and the
Tribunal granted the said application. That order came
to be challenged in another appeal. By the above
judgment, a Division Bench of this Court dismissed both
appeals and held that the claimants were entitled to
withdraw the original application under Section 166 of
the Act and to pray for award under Section 163-A of the
Act, notwithstanding pendency of the application under
Section 140 of the Act.
Section 163 in The Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 [Entire Act]
Section 167 in The Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 [Entire Act]
The Employee's Compensation Act, 1923
Guruanna Vedi And Anr. vs General Manager, Karnataka State Road ... on 10 April, 2001
8.3 In Guruanna Vadi & Anr. vs. The General
Manager, KSRTC & Anr., AIR 2001 Karnataka 275 a Full
Bench of the Karnataka High Court speaking through
Hon'ble Mr Justice Ashok Bhan (as His Lordship then was)
held that the claimant can move for amendment of his
claim petition under Section 166 to that of a petition
under Section 163-A at any stage of the proceedings. The
Full Bench observed as under:-