Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 9 of 9 (0.43 seconds)Section 86 in The Electricity Act, 2003 [Entire Act]
Section 61 in The Electricity Act, 2003 [Entire Act]
Section 62 in The Electricity Act, 2003 [Entire Act]
Section 95 in The Electricity Act, 2003 [Entire Act]
N.M. Desai vs The Testeels Ltd. And Anr. on 17 December, 1975
"It is now settled law that where an authority makes an
order in exercise of a quasi-judicial function, it must
record its reasons in support of the order it makes. Every
quasi-judicial order must be supported by reasons. That
has been laid down by a long line of decisions of this
Court ending with N.M. Desai Vs. Testeels Ltd., CA No.
245 of 1970 decided on 17.12.1975"
The Electricity Act, 2003
Union Of India (Uoi), Rep. By Dy. Chief ... vs Andhra Pradesh Electricity Regulatory ... on 2 March, 2006
26. As pointed out by the Learned Counsel for the
Appellant, the importance of supply of electricity to railway
traction at a reasonable price has also been emphasized by
this Tribunal in Appeal No. 79 of 2005 (Union of India
versus Andhra Pradesh State Commission) dated
02.03.2006. In the said judgment the Tribunal has observed
as follows:
Northern Railway vs Uttaranchal Electricity Regulatory ... on 28 November, 2007
20. Admittedly, neither the Electricity Board nor the State
Commission took into consideration the above circular while
claiming tariff increase or determining the same. As a
matter of fact, this Tribunal took note of the above circular
in its judgment dated 28.11.2007 in Appeal No. 219 of 2006
titled Northern Railway versus Uttranchal Electricity
Regulatory Commission and held as follows:
1