Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 6 of 6 (0.18 seconds)The Code of Civil Procedure, 1908
Jagir Singh vs Ranbir Singh & And on 9 November, 1978
In Jagir Singh v. Ranbir Singh, , the Apex Court has observed that an authority cannot be permitted to evade a law by "shift or contrivance."
M.C. Mehta vs Kamal Nath & Ors on 12 May, 2000
Law prohibits to do something indirectly which is prohibited to be done directly. Similar view has been reiterated by the Apex Court in M.C. Mehta v. Kamal Nath and Ors., AIR 2000 SC 1997 wherein it has been held that even the Supreme Court cannot achieve something indirectly which cannot be achieved directly by resorting to the provisions of Article 142 of the Constitution, which empowers the Court to pass any order in a case in order to do "complete justice.
Kuldeep Singh vs Ganpat Lal & Anr on 5 December, 1995
(iii) where there is a bonafide doubt that person/persons to whom the rent is to be tendered. Vide Kuldeep Singh v. Ganpat Lal, .
Article 142 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
1