Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 35 (0.88 seconds)
Petitioner vs ) The State Of Assam Represented By The on 25 May, 2021 cites

Commr.Of Police And Ors vs Sandeep Kumar on 17 March, 2011

(ii) The petitioner also has taken serious objection to the decision of the Administrative Committee held on 29.01.2018 which recommended imposition of penalty of dismissal contrary to the earlier decision of another Committee on 25.07.2014 which deals with all matters relating to Officers and Staff of the High Court, which opined that the petitioner need not be penalised by assigning proper reasons thereof, viz, that the petitioner was appointed on compassionate ground and there was no occasion to make any declaration regarding the criminal case as required to be done in the case of a regular appointment and in the police verification report there was no adverse material against him and also the petitioner was not aware of any further proceeding in respect of the aforesaid case till he was charge-sheeted. The Committee of the Officers and Staff while recommending so, considered the long length of service already rendered by the petitioner and decision of the Apex Court in Commissioner of Police Vs. Sandeep Kumar (supra).
Supreme Court of India Cites 2 - Cited by 385 - Full Document

Avtar Singh vs Union Of India & Ors on 21 July, 2016

However it is to be noted that the aforesaid case of Sandeep Kumar (supra) decided in 2011, was considered by the Apex Court in the subsequent case of Avtar Singh (supra) in 2016 and the Apex Court noted that the offence suppressed in the said case of Sandeep Kumar (supra) related to Section 325/34 IPC and at the time the incumbent was 20 years of age and the Apex Court by taking a lenient view held that the said suppression did not relate to involvement in a serious case.
Supreme Court of India Cites 38 - Cited by 1443 - A Mishra - Full Document
1   2 3 4 Next