Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 7 of 7 (0.74 seconds)
Satish Solvant Extractions Private ... vs The New India Assurance Company Ltd. on 9 January, 1996
cites
West Bengal Financial Corporation And ... vs Bertram Scott (I) Ltd. (In Liquidation) on 6 October, 1982
We have given a careful consideration to the above decision. However, We find it difficult to subscribe to the above opinion. In our views, as earlier stated, the Court has a discretion both in the matter of grant of the interest and the rate of interst. The decision however should be exercised judiciously and interest should be granted unless there are good reason for not granting the same.
Chaturbhuj Tulsiram Marwadi vs Ambarsing Harji on 26 March, 1931
In Chaturbhuj v. Ambarsing, this Court held:
Bank Of Bihar Ltd. vs Ramghulam Singh And Anr. on 11 January, 1932
In Bank Of Bihar v. Ramghulam, the Patna High Court held that the facts that the Court is given a discretion in the matter makes it nonetheless a right of the plaintiff, that is to say, a right which he may claim.
The United Commercial Bank, Silchar vs Satish Chandra Ghosh And Anr. on 1 March, 1989
Dealing with the nature of the power of the Court under Section 34 of the C. P. C., in United Commercial Bank v. Satish Chandra Ghosh, the Gauhati High Court observed:
The Code of Civil Procedure, 1908
The Banking Companies (Acquisition And Transfer Of Undertakings) Act, 1970
1