Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 7 of 7 (0.21 seconds)Section 2 in The University Grants Commission Act, 1956 [Entire Act]
The University Grants Commission Act, 1956
Sirsi Municipality By Its President ... vs Cecelia Kom Francis Tellis on 18 January, 1973
30. It is well settled that when the action of the State or its instrumentalities is not as per the rules or regulations and supported by a statute, the Court must exercise its jurisdiction to declare such an act to be illegal and invalid. Hon'ble the Apex Court in Sirsi Municipality Vs. Cecelia Kom Francis Tellis8, observed that "the ratio is that the rules or the regulations are binding on the authorities."
Sukhdev Singh & Ors vs Bagatram Sardar Singh Raghuvanshi And ... on 21 February, 1975
A Constitution Bench of Hon'ble Apex Court in Sukhdev Singh & Ors. v. Bhagatram Sardar Singh Raghuvanshi & Anr.9, has observed as under:-
Commissioner Of Police, Bombay vs Gordhandas Bhanji on 23 November, 1951
In Commissioner of Police (supra), the Apex Court observed as under:-
Dr. Bhaktiputra Rohtam vs Union Of India And 4 Others on 7 August, 2023
6. The petitioner made two representations dated 14.03.2023 and 09.06.2023 to the Vice Chancellor, BHU requesting to promote him on the post of Professor in the Department of Dharmagam w.e.f. 04.11.2021 under CAS and further appoint him on contractual basis for a period of five years till the age of 70 years on contract basis in accordance with Regulation 2.1 of the Regulations, 2018. The representation of the petitioner was turned down by the respondent on 23.05.2023 on the ground that since the petitioner had retired as an Associate Professor and not as a Professor, thus, he was not entitled to be considered for grant of engagement on contractual basis till 70 years. The said order was challenged in Writ-A No.11409 of 2023 (Dr. Bhaktiputra Rohtam v. Union of India & Ors.). Finally, the said writ petition was disposed of on 07.08.2023, the operative portion of same, for ready reference, is reproduced as under:-
1