Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 14 (0.23 seconds)

1. Surya Estates & Anr. vs 1. Venkateshwara Sarma & Ors. on 22 April, 2013

In this regard, Hon'ble National Commission in Surya Estate V. Venkateshwara Sarma III (2013) CPJ 170 (NC) has held that the limitation for the purpose of Section 24A of the Consumer Protection Act has to be counted two years from the date of DISMISSED PAGE 6 OF 10 FA/283/2015 M/S. BHIWADI POLYMERS LTD. VS. THE NEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO. LTD. D.O.D.: 15.12.2025 'cause of action has arisen'. Therefore, once the cause of action has arisen limitation will have to be counted from that date irrespective of the facts as to what transpired between the parties subsequently.
National Consumer Disputes Redressal Cites 6 - Cited by 9 - Full Document

State Bank Of India vs M/S. B.S. Agricultural Industries(I) on 20 March, 2009

In State Bank of India Vs. B.S. Agricultural Industries II (2009) CPJ 29 (SC) the Hon'ble Supreme Court in para 13 has observed that in the context of insurance against fire it means when the fire took place. It has also been held that Section 24A is pre-emptory in which case a duty on the District Consumer Forum is cast upon to see that it shall not admit a complaint if the same was barred by period of limitation and that it is a command of law.
Supreme Court of India Cites 7 - Cited by 623 - R M Lodha - Full Document
1   2 Next