Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 36 (0.26 seconds)Section 17 in The Registration Act, 1908 [Entire Act]
The Registration Act, 1908
Liverpool & London S.P. & I Asson. Ltd vs M.V. Sea Success I & Anr on 20 November, 2003
The Supreme Court reiterated the test laid down in Liverpool and
London S.P. and I Association Ltd. v. M.V. Sea Success [(2004) 9 SCC
512], which inter alia provides that whether the plaint discloses a cause
of action or not is essentially a question of fact. However, whether it
does or does not must be found from the reading of the plaint itself
during which the averments made in the plaint in their entirety must be
held to be correct. In other words, the plaint must be construed as it
stands, without addition or subtraction of words.
Shankarlal Narayandas vs The New Mofussil Co. Ltd. on 13 March, 1946
"21. There is no dispute that even a decree for specific performance
can be granted on the basis of oral contract. Lord Du Parcq in a case
Shankarlal Narayandas Mundade vs. New Mofussil Company
Limited (AIR 1946 Privy Council) 97 observed, while deciding a suit
Page 25 of 39
Downloaded on : Sun Aug 22 02:12:17 IST 2021
C/FA/254/2020 JUDGMENT DATED: 20/07/2021
for specific performance, that an oral contract is valid, binding and
enforceable. A decree for specific performance could be passed on the
basis of oral agreement.
Section 18 in The Registration Act, 1908 [Entire Act]
Section 49 in The Registration Act, 1908 [Entire Act]
Hermes Marines Limited vs Capeshore Maritime Partners Fzc & on 22 April, 2016
51. In the view of this Court, 'law' cannot be confined only to mean the
enacted law contained in a statute, framed by the legislature. The scope
and amplitude of the word 'law' is much wider than that and takes
within its sweep the binding precedents of the Supreme Court, being
the highest Court in the country. When one speaks to law, one refers to
all that is legally binding upon the courts and citizens. Judgments of the
courts have interpreted various provisions of the statutes and the result
of the interpretation is the law laid down by judicial precedent. The
word 'law' connotes judgemade law as much as statute-law. The final
judicial interpretation of any provision of a statute by a Court,
especially the Apex Court or the final determination of any issue arising
before it is very much 'law'. The law expounded by the Supreme Court
is binding on all courts of the country under Article 141 of the
Constitution of India. A pronouncement or determination on any legal
issue decided by the Supreme Court becomes the law of the land.
Dr. Virendra Kumar Dixit & Anr. vs State Of U.P. Thru Collector, Luccknow & ... on 15 October, 2014
52. A Division Bench of the High Court of Allahabad has, in the case of
Virender Kumar Dixit v. State of U.P. 2014(9) ADJ 1506, succinctly and
aptly stated thus:
Brij Mohan And Ors vs Smt. Sugra Begum And Ors on 19 July, 1990
29 The Supreme Court, while considering the provisions of Section
54 of the Transfer of Property Act with regard to the specific
performance of oral agreement of sale sought in the case of Brij Mohan
and others vs. Sugra Begum and others reported in (1990) 4 SCC 147 at
paragraph 20 has held as under: