Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 21 (0.26 seconds)Section 323 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Section 341 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
The Indian Penal Code, 1860
Section 313 in The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 [Entire Act]
Aher Raja Khima vs The State Of Saurashtra on 22 December, 1955
[26] It is not necessary to refer to various decisions on the point.
We may, however, state that before more than half-a-century, in
the leading case of Aher Raja Khima v. State of Saurashtra, AIR
1956 SC 217, Venkatarama Ayyar, J. stated: (AIR p.230,para 40)
`40......The presumption that a person acts honestly applies
as much in favour of a police officer as of other persons,
and it is not judicial approach to distrust and suspect him
without good grounds therefor. Such an attitude could do
neither credit to the magistracy nor good to the public. It
FIR no. 255/17 PS Jafrabad State vs. Vishal Jaiswal @ Sumit Page 19 of 21
can only run down the prestige of the police administration".
Tahir vs State (Delhi) on 21 March, 1996
(emphasis supplied) [26]
In Tahir v. State (Delhi), (1996) 3 SCC 338, dealing with a
similar question, Dr. A.S. Anand, J. (as His Lordship then
was) stated: (SCC p.341, para6)
`6.....Where the evidence of the police officials, after careful
scrutiny, inspires confidence and is found to be trustworthy
and reliable, it can form basis of conviction and the absence
of some independent witness of the locality to lend
corroboration to their evidence, does not in any way affect
the creditworthiness of the prosecution case."
Section 319 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Section 321 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Abdul Sayeed vs State Of M.P on 14 September, 2010
19. At this juncture, it is essential to reproduce the observations of the
Hon'ble Supreme Court in "Abdul Sayeed v. State of M.P"., [(2010) 10 SCC
259], which are as follows: