Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 8 of 8 (0.53 seconds)
Farooq Ahmad Bhat & Ors vs Ut Of J&K& Others on 7 February, 2023 cites

Adi Saiva Sivachariyargal N.Sangam ... vs Govt. Of Tamil Nadu & Anr on 16 December, 2015

11) Similarly, the Apex Court in Adi Saiva Sivachariyargal Nala Sangam (supra), has observed that institution of writ proceedings need not await actual prejudice and adverse effect and consequences. In the said case, the writ petitioners had assailed certain orders and ordinances issued by the Government of State of Tamil Nadu. Relevant extract of the judgment, for the facility of reference, is reproduced below:
Supreme Court of India Cites 30 - Cited by 40 - R Gogoi - Full Document

Manish S. Pardasani vs Inspector State Excise on 7 January, 2019

"To answer the said question, it is only apposite to refer to a decision of the Hon'ble Apex Court in Manish S. Pardasani v. Inspector State Excise, reported in [2019(2) SCC 660]. In the said decision, the Apex Court while deprecating the judgment carrying certain directions issued in a writ petition filed apprehending issuance of an adverse order by an appellate authority held that the High Court should not have pre-empted the passing of any adverse order by an authority and further held that the settled position is that a court could stay or quash only those orders, which are impugned in the lis before it and in other words, only if an order is actually passed, that will be available for challenge and a writ petition P a g e | 10 founded only on an apprehension shall not be maintained under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. Certainly, this Court will not be justified in passing an order not to execute a detention order when the petitioner himself is not certain whether such an order has been passed against him.
Supreme Court of India Cites 2 - Cited by 2 - A M Sapre - Full Document
1