Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 11 (0.30 seconds)Section 304 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Section 324 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Section 323 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Section 149 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Section 302 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Ankush Maruti Shinde . vs State Of Maharashtra on 5 March, 2019
In this regard, learned counsel for the
appellants also placed reliance upon the judgement of the Single Bench of
the Bombay High Court passed in Maruti vs. State of Maharashtra in
Signature Not Verified
Signed by: MONIKA
CHOURASIA
Signing time: 9/24/2022
12:02:45 PM
16
Criminal Appeal no.346/1997. But, the facts of this case do not match
with the present case. In that case, the incident sparked off in the spur of
the moment and no weapon was used by either of the appellants while in
this case, the appellants assaulted the deceased, due to old enmity and
used weapons like stick and spear to cause injuries to the injured, so that
judgement does not assist the appellants.
Alister Anthony Pareira vs State Of Maharashtra on 12 January, 2012
14. Regarding sentencing of accused Apex court in the case of Alister
Anthony Pareira v. State of Maharashtra, (2012) 2 SCC 648 observed
thus: (SCC p. 674, para 84)
"84. Sentencing is an important task in the matters of crime. One of
the prime objectives of the criminal law is imposition of appropriate,
adequate, just and proportionate sentence commensurate with the
nature and gravity of crime and the manner in which the crime is
done. There is no straitjacket formula for sentencing an accused on
proof of crime. The courts have evolved certain principles: the twin
objective of the sentencing policy is deterrence and correction. What
sentence would meet the ends of justice depends on the facts and
circumstances of each case and the court must keep in mind the
gravity of the crime, motive for the crime, nature of the offence and all
other attendant circumstances."