Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 11 (2.92 seconds)The Indian Stamp Act, 1899
Section 49 in The Registration Act, 1908 [Entire Act]
The Registration Act, 1908
Vinod Kumar & Anr. vs Ajit Singh on 1 October, 2013
11. However, on behalf of the petitioner, reliance is placed in
Gomuguntla Leela Krishna Murtghy v. Kancherla
Koteswaramma and another1 and judgment of High court of Delhi
in Vinod Kumar & another vs Ajit Singh, in I.A.No. 20617/2012
in CS (OS) 2661/2012, dated 01.10.2013, in respect of application
of Section 17(1A) of the Registration Act and Article-23A of Schedule
1A of Indian Stamp Act (Delhi Amendment Act, 2001).
Banguru Ramathulasamma vs Yedem Masthan Reddy And Ors. on 10 August, 1998
12. However, it is pointed out for the respondents that recitals of
this possessory agreement for sale an important in deciding its
1
.2019(5) ALD 2 (AP)
MVR,J
CRP.No.4910 OF 2016
4
nature. Thus, it is contended that it is an out and out sale deed,
whereby right, title and interest have been conveyed to the
purchaser. Therefore, according to the respondent, it is inadmissible
in evidence in terms of Section 17(i)(b) of the Registration Act. Thus,
it is contended that it cannot merely be treated as an agreement for
sale coupled with delivery of possession. Reliance is placed in this
context in Banguru Ramathulasamma vs. Yedem Masthan Reddy
and others 1998(4) ALT 796.
The Indian Stamp (Orissa Amendment) Act, 2001
Section 2 in The Indian Stamp Act, 1899 [Entire Act]
Kashinath Bhaskar Datar vs Bhaskar Vishweshwar Karve on 22 February, 1952
"The disputed document in that case was a mortgage deed. While
referring to the provisions of Section 17 of the Act their Lordships of
Supreme Court have observed in paragraph 16 after referring to the
observations made by S.D.Mullah in his commentary as follows:
Gomuguntla Leela Krishna Murthy vs Kancherla Koteswaramma And Another on 24 June, 2019
11. However, on behalf of the petitioner, reliance is placed in
Gomuguntla Leela Krishna Murtghy v. Kancherla
Koteswaramma and another1 and judgment of High court of Delhi
in Vinod Kumar & another vs Ajit Singh, in I.A.No. 20617/2012
in CS (OS) 2661/2012, dated 01.10.2013, in respect of application
of Section 17(1A) of the Registration Act and Article-23A of Schedule
1A of Indian Stamp Act (Delhi Amendment Act, 2001).