Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 7 of 7 (0.31 seconds)Section 43 in The Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 [Entire Act]
Section 56 in The Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 [Entire Act]
Section 15 in The Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 [Entire Act]
Section 50 in The Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 [Entire Act]
Sudha Beevi vs State Of Kerala on 2 April, 2004
trial court against which the complainant has not preferred any appeal
and those judgments of acquittal have become final. The petitioner was
acquitted in those two cases mainly on the ground that the vehicle,
which was the subject matter of the hire purchase agreement, was
taken possession by the complainant in May/June 2000, whereas the
two dishonoured cheques in question in those two cases were
presented only after such repossession. Therefore, the trial court in
those two cases held that the consideration in respect of those two
cheques issued in respect of the monthly EMI for the hire purchase
agreement, has failed as envisaged in Section 43 of the Negotiable
Instruments Act, in the light of the legal principles laid down by this Court
in the case in Sudha Beevi v. State of Kerala reported in (2004 (2)
KLT 746).
Section 51 in The Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 [Entire Act]
1