Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 2 of 2 (0.26 seconds)Vadiraj Naggappa Vernekar (D) Th. Lrs vs Sharad Chand Prabhakar Gogate on 24 February, 2009
7. The learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner had relied on the decision, reported in Vadiraj Naggappa Vernekar V. Sharadchandra Prabhakar Gogate (2009(4) SCC 410), wherein it has been held that the main purpose of Order XVIII Rule 17 of the Civil Procedure Code, 1908, is to enable the Court concerned to clarify doubts that may have arisen during the course of the examination of the witnesses. If evidence on re-examination of a witness has a bearing on the ultimate decision of the suit, the trial Court may permit the recall of such witness for re-examination in chief, with the permission to the defendants to cross examine the witnesses.
1