Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 10 (0.88 seconds)

Kiriti Pal vs State Of West Bengal on 16 April, 2015

Section 106 does not shift the burden of proof in a criminal trial, which is always upon the prosecution. It lays down the rule that when the accused does not throw any light upon facts which are specially within his knowledge and which could not support any theory or hypothesis compatible with his innocence, the court can consider his failure to adduce any explanation, as an additional link which completes the chain. The principle has been succinctly stated in Naina Mohd., Re. (AIR 1960 Mad 218)". The above judgment was relied upon and reiterated in Kiriti Pal vs. State of West Bengal, (2015) 5 Scale 319.
Supreme Court - Daily Orders Cites 22 - Cited by 58 - R Banumathi - Full Document

Rumi Bora Dutta vs State Of Assam on 24 May, 2013

13. A similar view has been taken by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Rumi Bora v. State of Assam, (2013) 7 SCC 417, wherein it has been accepted that a false answer offered by the accused when his attention is drawn to the circumstances, it renders a circumstances to be of inculpating nature i.e. in such a situation a false answer can also be counted as providing a missing link for completing the chain.
Supreme Court of India Cites 14 - Cited by 83 - D Misra - Full Document
1