Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 3 of 3 (0.22 seconds)
Mohammed Hussain Bevi Alias Syed Sultan ... vs Haja Sultan Kabir Shahul Hameed Sahib on 26 July, 1988 cites

Jaiwanti Kumri vs Gajadhar Upadhya on 11 April, 1911

In Jaiwanti Kumari v. Gajadhar Upadhya I.L.R. 38 Cal. 783, it was laid down that the mere fact of the mother being a pardanashin lady is no obstacle to her being appointed as a guardian and that though a pardanashin lady may not be able to personally supervise the management of the properties, the safe custody of the property and its due administration may be sufficiently guaranteed by security being taken from the proposed guardian by Court.
Calcutta High Court Cites 2 - Cited by 3 - Full Document

Kali Bakhsh Singh vs Ram Gopal Singh on 27 November, 1913

The only ground put against the claim of the mother, as could be gathered from paragraph 6 of the order of the Court below, is that she is a pardanashin lady and for everything regarding the administration of the properties of the minor, she will have to depend upon her second husband. The Court below also observed that the second husband of the appellant herein had been evincing very keen interest in the Welfare of the minor. The fact: that the appellant is a pardanashin lady cannot be considered as a disqualification while considering her claim for appointing her as the guardian for the properties of the minor. It will be relevant to recall in this connection the following observations of the Privy Council in Kali Baksh Singh v. Ram Gopal Singh 26 M.L.J. 121.
Bombay High Court Cites 0 - Cited by 33 - Full Document
1