Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 11 (0.20 seconds)Section 397 in The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 [Entire Act]
Section 203 in The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 [Entire Act]
Section 378 in The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 [Entire Act]
The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973
Section 202 in The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 [Entire Act]
Section 138 in The Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 [Entire Act]
Section 398 in The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 [Entire Act]
Section 204 in The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 [Entire Act]
Subhash B.Ravu vs K.V.Varghese on 9 September, 2010
In the case of Subhash B. Rao vs K.V. Varghese and another,
reported in 2010 SCC Online (Ker.) 2684, the Kerala High Court has held
that in cases in which summons are ordered but not issued for want of
process fee, there will be no day appointed for 'appearance' of accused in
Crmp 197 of 2024
6
Court, as referred to in Section 256(1) of the Code. Hence, in cases in
which process fee is not remitted, the accused shall not be acquitted,
under Section 256(1) of the Code, even if the complainant is absent.
Dismissal of a complaint under Section 204(4) of Cr.P.C. is not an
appealable order as the said order could not be treated as an order of
acquittal.