Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 8 of 8 (0.32 seconds)Section 14 in Indian Divorce Act, 1869 [Entire Act]
Section 438 in The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 [Entire Act]
Florence Amelia Thompson vs George S. Thompson on 29 November, 1911
5. Counsel for the petitioner has argued that if this view be adopted, he is entitled to invoke the aid of the well established principle that condonation is cancelled by a subsequent matrimonial offence and the old cause of complaint is revived. Reliance has been placed upon the decision of my learned brother Mr. Justice Fletcher in Thompson v. Thompson 15 Ind. Cas. 886 : 39 C. 395, where it was conclusively shown, upon an exhaustive review of the relevant authorities on the subject, that condoned adultery is revived by a subsequent matrimonial offence. This principle is based on the theory that condonation of a matrimonial offence implies that no further matrimonial offence shall occur.
The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973
Section 10 in Indian Divorce Act, 1869 [Entire Act]
Section 12 in Indian Divorce Act, 1869 [Entire Act]
Beatrice Alice De Ste Croix vs Philip De Ste Croix on 23 January, 1917
The expression conjugal cohabitation, or its equivalent, connubial intercourse, should not be given a restricted meaning but should be BO interpreted as to leave the nature of the cohabitation or intercourse to be adapted to the varying conditions and circumstances of different parties: De Ste Croix v. De Ste Croix 41 Ind. Cas. 447 : 44 0. 1091 at p. 1110 : 21 C.W.N. 717. There may thus be room for discussion or difference of opinion in individual instances, whether a particular conduct on the part of the husband or the wife could be construed as condonation.
1