Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 10 (0.19 seconds)Section 3 in The Limitation Act, 1963 [Entire Act]
Section 100 in The Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 [Entire Act]
Article 227 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
Section 4 in The Limitation Act, 1963 [Entire Act]
M/S Essar Constructions vs N.P. Rama Krishna Reddy on 3 May, 2000
9. The Supreme Court in the case of M/S Essar Constructions vs.
N.P. Rama Krishna Reddy, (2000) 6 SCC 94 and Union of India and
others vs. Manager, M/S Jain & Associates, (2001) 3 SCC 277, has
clarified the position of law and has held that consequence of dismissal
of condonation application is upholding of the judgment impugned and
rejection of the belated appeal.
Section 25 in The Limitation Act, 1963 [Entire Act]
Union Of India And Others vs Manager M/S Jain And Associates on 6 February, 2001
9. The Supreme Court in the case of M/S Essar Constructions vs.
N.P. Rama Krishna Reddy, (2000) 6 SCC 94 and Union of India and
others vs. Manager, M/S Jain & Associates, (2001) 3 SCC 277, has
clarified the position of law and has held that consequence of dismissal
of condonation application is upholding of the judgment impugned and
rejection of the belated appeal.
Union Of India (Uoi) vs Nek Ram Sharma on 8 September, 2003
10. A bench of this Court in the case of Union of India vs. Nek Ram
Sharma, 2004(1) JKJ 280, considered this issue in the light of supra
judgments of the Supreme Court and held that ―an order rejecting the
application under Section 5 of the Limitation Act or for that matter
condonation under any other law merges with the order that may
ultimately be passed in the application or the appeal. The consequence of
dismissal of application of condonation of application is rejection of an
application or the appeal, as the case may be. Therefore, the outcome of
such rejection is upholding an order subject matter of appeal.‖
The Code of Civil Procedure, 1908
1