Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 6 of 6 (0.32 seconds)

Steffen, Robertson And Kirsten ... vs Commissioner Of Income-Tax on 29 October, 1997

4.9 In the case of Steffen, Robertson and Kirsten Consulting Engineers and Scientists vs. Commissioner of Income Tax. [1998] 230 ITR 0206 [Authority for Advance Ruling], the Hon'ble Authority for Advance Ruling in its order dated 29.10.1997 held that "the living allowance paid to the foreign. technicians will form an integral part of the fees payable to SRK under the agreement and will also be taxable in India."
Authority Tribunal Cites 8 - Cited by 13 - Full Document

Danfoss Industries P Ltd., Chennai vs Department Of Income Tax on 24 June, 2013

In Danfoss Industries P. Ltd. vs. Commissioner of Income Tax [2004] 268 ITR 0001 [Authority for Advance Ruling], the Hon'ble Authority in its order dated 14.05,2004 held that "the payments to be made by the applicant pursuant to the agreement proposed to be entered into between the said Danfoss Singapore for the services to be provided by it to the applicant cannot be said to be reimbursement of the actual expenditure incurred by Danfoss Singapore and it cannot be said that no income is embedded into such payment, therefore, the payments have to be made after withholding tax under Section 195 of the Act." 4.11. The Authority for Advance Ruling again in the in the case of Timken India Ltd. [2005] 273 ITR 0067 held:
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal - Chennai Cites 4 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1