Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 18 (1.09 seconds)

Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax 11 vs Rajesh Bajaj (D) Th. Lrs Smt. Sapna Bajaj on 3 November, 2017

In rejoinder, the ld. Counsel for the assessee referred to the judgment of the Co-ordinate Bench in the case of ACIT vs. Priyanka Ankit Miglani (ITA No.2530/MUM/2021 and Ors. order dated 21.03.2023 wherein the decision was rendered in favour of the assessee after taking note of the judgment delivered in the case of Swati Bajaj (supra). The Ld. Counsel thus firmly asserted that the revenue authorities have proceeded on skewed understanding of facts and law ITA No.817 & 818/Del/2023 8 involved in the case.
Supreme Court - Daily Orders Cites 0 - Cited by 21 - Full Document

Acit- Cc-5(4), Mumbai vs Priyanka Ankit Miglani, Mumbai on 21 March, 2023

In rejoinder, the ld. Counsel for the assessee referred to the judgment of the Co-ordinate Bench in the case of ACIT vs. Priyanka Ankit Miglani (ITA No.2530/MUM/2021 and Ors. order dated 21.03.2023 wherein the decision was rendered in favour of the assessee after taking note of the judgment delivered in the case of Swati Bajaj (supra). The Ld. Counsel thus firmly asserted that the revenue authorities have proceeded on skewed understanding of facts and law ITA No.817 & 818/Del/2023 8 involved in the case.
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal - Mumbai Cites 30 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1   2 Next