Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 4 of 4 (0.17 seconds)Deepal Girishbhai Soni And Ors vs United India Insurance Co. Ltd., Baroda on 18 March, 2004
---Vimentioned the monthly income of the deceased as
Rs.3,500/-- being the salary and Rs.1,500/-- towards
over time, thus, in all Rs.5,000/-- per month. It is well
/iv
settled law that claim petition under Section l63--A
being a social security provision, its benefit
availed only by those whose annual _
Rs.40,000/- and all other clairnants _ciairn'1_n:_g-higher" it
income can approach the Tribunal 1;i1i.deric::ot'
the Act. This position of has elearly{"'1ai,c1 <i1ovvn--.i '
by the Apex Court in. grid Others
Vs United Insurance reported in AIR
2004 sc Agttltthpex Court has
observed . it it
tttt of the 0Plnion
"S has correctly been
decided.
E. T. Sunup vs C. A. N. S. S. Employees Assocn. & Anr on 13 October, 2004
It is once again well settled
'T V. A pr.inciple"'that in case of death of Bachelor, the
Vlldelductioriévtltoifikards personal expenses is to be 50% and
only rvemlaining 50% should be taken as contribution of
_ the deeeased to the family for the purpose of quantifying
T loss of dependency.
The Motor Vehicles Act, 1988
1