Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 11 (0.23 seconds)
Vadodara Municipal Corporation vs Vadodara Municipal Corporation Kamdar ... on 21 June, 2024 cites

Bhawani Prasad Sonkar vs Union Of India & Ors on 11 March, 2011

It also can be noticed that the decision in (01) SBI v Jaspal Kaur (2007) 9 SCC 571, (02) SBI v. Raj Kumar 2010 (11) SCC 661, (03) Bhawani Prasad Sonkar v. Union of India & Ors., (2011) 4 SCC 209 and (04) Canara Bank and another v. M. Mahesh Kumar, (2015) 7 SCC 412, respectively were rendered by coordinate Bench of the Supreme Court constituting equal strength.
Supreme Court of India Cites 8 - Cited by 632 - D K Jain - Full Document

Umesh Kumar Nagpal vs State Of Haryana (Sawant, J.) on 4 May, 1994

In Umesh Naraoji Ugale (supra), the compassionate appointment was declined on the ground of a ban on compassionate appointment imposed on 22.08.2005 which was continued by a resolution dated 22.03.2012. This Court, however, found on facts that a relaxation had initially been granted for persons on the wait list till 31.12.2011. Thereafter, by a resolution dated 01.03.2014, the Government of Maharashtra had decided to increase the recruitment of Group 'C' and 'D' posts on compassionate ground from 5% to 10?% of vacant posts of Class 'C' and 'D' from 2012. The Court, therefore, concluded that the Government was continuing to make appointments on compassionate ground despite ban of 2005.
Supreme Court of India Cites 1 - Cited by 2647 - P B Sawant - Full Document

Balbir Kaur & Anr vs Steel Authority Of India Ltd. & Ors on 5 May, 2000

In Balbir Kaur (Supra), this Court held on facts that a family benefit scheme assuring monthly payment to the family of a deceased employee was not a substitute for compassionate Page 33 of 36 Downloaded on : Fri Jul 12 21:07:40 IST 2024 NEUTRAL CITATION C/SCA/8295/2017 JUDGMENT DATED: 21/06/2024 undefined appointment. The finding was rendered in the context of the applicable circular pertaining to appointment on compassionate grounds.
Supreme Court of India Cites 7 - Cited by 493 - U C Banerjee - Full Document

Union Of India & Anr vs B. Kishore on 6 April, 2011

9. It can be noticed that in Canara Bank & Anr. v. M.Maheshkumar (supra), Raj Kumar (supra) was cited and referred to in paragraph No.5 of the judgment alongwith Umesh Kumar Nagpai v. State of Haryana Page 26 of 36 Downloaded on : Fri Jul 12 21:07:40 IST 2024 NEUTRAL CITATION C/SCA/8295/2017 JUDGMENT DATED: 21/06/2024 undefined (1994) 4 SCC 138; Sail v. Madhusudan Das (2008) 15 SCC 560; Union of India v. B. Kishore (2011) 13 SCC 131 and State of Haryana v. Naresh Kumar Bali (1994) 4 SCC 448.
Supreme Court of India Cites 3 - Cited by 193 - A Alam - Full Document

State Of Haryana vs Naresh Kumar Bali on 17 May, 1994

9. It can be noticed that in Canara Bank & Anr. v. M.Maheshkumar (supra), Raj Kumar (supra) was cited and referred to in paragraph No.5 of the judgment alongwith Umesh Kumar Nagpai v. State of Haryana Page 26 of 36 Downloaded on : Fri Jul 12 21:07:40 IST 2024 NEUTRAL CITATION C/SCA/8295/2017 JUDGMENT DATED: 21/06/2024 undefined (1994) 4 SCC 138; Sail v. Madhusudan Das (2008) 15 SCC 560; Union of India v. B. Kishore (2011) 13 SCC 131 and State of Haryana v. Naresh Kumar Bali (1994) 4 SCC 448.
Supreme Court of India Cites 3 - Cited by 169 - S Mohan - Full Document

Gujarat Housing Board, Ahmedabad vs Nagajibhai Laxmanbhai And Ors. on 19 September, 1985

The issue is no more res integra in view of the decision rendered by Full Bench of this Court in Gujarat Housing Board, Ahmedabad v Nagjibhai Laxmanbhai & Ors., AIR 1986 Gujarat 81 wherein it has been held in paragraph 12 that in case of conflict of two decisions (binding decisions) the later view would prevail; relevant part of which reads thus:
Gujarat High Court Cites 16 - Cited by 31 - S B Majmudar - Full Document
1   2 Next