Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 5 of 5 (0.39 seconds)P. Nedumaran vs The State Of Tamil Nadu, Rep. By ... on 14 August, 2001
3.The learned single Judge has noticed that there is no absolute ban in taking out the procession, but it is purely a regulated exercise and in view of the earlier Judgments rendered by this Court in P.NEDUMARAN v. STATE OF TAMIL NADU [1999 (1) LW (crl) 73] and in C.J.RAJAN v. DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE [2008 (3) MLJ 296], allowed the Writ Petitions. Hence, the present Writ Appeals.
C.J. Rajan vs Deputy Superintendent Of Police on 30 January, 2008
3.The learned single Judge has noticed that there is no absolute ban in taking out the procession, but it is purely a regulated exercise and in view of the earlier Judgments rendered by this Court in P.NEDUMARAN v. STATE OF TAMIL NADU [1999 (1) LW (crl) 73] and in C.J.RAJAN v. DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE [2008 (3) MLJ 296], allowed the Writ Petitions. Hence, the present Writ Appeals.
Himat Lal K. Shah vs Commissioner Of Police, Ahmedabad & Anr on 15 September, 1972
8.Again in HIMAT LAL K.SHAH v. COMMISIONER OF POLICE, AHMEDABAD AND ANR [AIR 1973 SC 87 (V 60 C 18)], while concurring with the conclusions of the learned Chief Justice, in his independent opinion, Justice Mathew has brought out the the principle in the following words:
The Societies Registration Act, 1860
1