Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 8 of 8 (0.31 seconds)The State Of Gujarat vs Narayan @ Narayan Sai @ Mota Bhagwan ... on 20 October, 2021
9. The Apex Court, in a recent judgment in State of Gujarat and
another vs. Narayan @ Narayan Sai @ Mota Bhagwan Asaram @ Adumal
Harpalani [Crl.Appeal No.1159 of 2021 arising out of SLP (Crl.) No.5699
of 2021] decided on 24.06.2021, while dealing with Rule 17 of Prisons
(Bombay Furlough and Parole) Rules, 1959, which is similar to Rule 3 of the
6/9
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
W.P.(MD) No.18314 of 2020
Rules, 1982, refused to grant leave to the respondent therein.
Article 14 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
Article 21 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
Section 4 in The Narcotic Drugs And Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 [Entire Act]
Section 9 in The Narcotic Drugs And Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 [Entire Act]
S. Rajaram vs The Secretary To Government, School ... on 21 October, 2003
3. Learned counsel for the Petitioner submitted that in similar
circumstances, this Court in the case of S.Rajan vs. State [W.P.No.4247
of 2021] dated 23.02.2021 had considered the case of the petitioner
therein positively for grant of leave. Learned counsel also referred to
Paragraph No.4 of the order, which reads as under:
N.Bhuvaneswari vs State Of Tamil Nadu on 25 April, 2014
“25. Rule 35 is intended to ensure that the Executive
does not release a convict prisoner on ordinary leave during
the pendency of trial against him and thus, shirk the
responsibility to produce him before the Trial Court,
irrespective of whether a person is on bail in that case or
not.”
1