Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 27 (0.35 seconds)The Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988
Section 201 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Section 17 in The Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 [Entire Act]
Section 13 in The Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 [Entire Act]
C.M.Girish Babu vs Cbi, Cochin, High Court Of Kerala on 24 February, 2009
(i) In C.M.Girish Babu V. C.B.I. Reported in 2009(3) SCC. The relevant
portion in para 24 is extracted hereunder:
R. Sundararajan vs State By D.S.P., Spe, Cbi, Chennai on 19 October, 2006
8.9.Considering the above said citations along with the facts of the
present case and the evidence of P.W.1, P.W.1 in his evidence has stated
that he gone through the entire relevant material papers including Ex.P2 and
after satisfied himself, he accorded sanction. Merely because Ex.P2 has not
contained any forwarding endorsement alleged to be made by A1, it will not
vitiate the sanction as per the dictum of Apex Court reported in 2007(2)
Supreme Court Cases (Cri) 563 ? R.Sundararajan Vs. State, relied on by the
learned Government Advocate (criminal side). Hence, I am of the view that
the argument advanced by the learned counsel for the appellants that the
sanction authority has not applied his mind, while granting sanction for
prosecution does not merit acceptance.
Kootha Perumal vs State Tr.Insp.Of Police Vig.& Anti ... on 15 December, 2010
8.5.For the same proposition, a portion of para 14 of the decision
reported in AIR 2011 Supreme Court 356 ? Kootha Perumal V. State Tr.Inspector
of Police, Vigilance and Anti Corruption is also extracted hereunder:
State Of Maharashtra Tr.C.B.I vs Mahesh G.Jain on 28 May, 2013
8.6.In 2013 Crl. L.J. 3092 ? State of Maharashtra V. Mahesh G.Jain,
wherein para No.13, it was mentioned as to what are the principles to be
followed while according sanction, which is also extracted hereunder:
Som Parkash vs State Of Punjab on 29 November, 1991
11.2.It is true, the trap witnesses are not independent witnesses.
Their evidence needs corroboration. It is appropriate to consider the
decision of Apex Court in Som Prakash V. State of Punjab reported in AIR 1992
SC 665, where, the Apex Court has held in para 2 as follows: