Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 7 of 7 (0.23 seconds)

M/S Bajaj Allianz Life Insurance Co. Ltd vs Commissioner Of Central Excise, ... on 31 December, 2014

In the case Bajaj Allianz Life Insurance Co. Ltd. & Ors. Vs. Raj Kumar III (2014) CPJ 221 (NC), it was held by the Hon'ble National Commission that usually, the authorized doctor of the Insurance Company examines the insured to assess the fitness and only after complete satisfaction, the policy is issued. It was held that the Insurance Company wrongly repudiated the claim of the complainant. If, in the present case, the complainant was suffering from hypertension, then at the time of taking the policy, the panelled doctors of the Insurance Company must have detected the same and the opposite party could have denied the policy to him then and there. Moreover, merely on the basis of Statement of Attending Physician, Ex.O-1, without any supporting medical record, it cannot be said that the complainant was suffering from hypertension earlier to the taking the policy. Furthermore, no previous medical record of the complainant has been produced by the opposite party to show that he was suffering from the hypertension since the year 2009.
Custom, Excise & Service Tax Tribunal Cites 5 - Cited by 8 - Full Document

Chandan Jain Wife Of Late Sh. Satish ... vs Bajaj Allianz Life Insurance Company ... on 13 January, 2014

13. Even otherwise, hypertension is a lifestyle disease and it cannot be made the basis of repudiation of the claim of the consumer. The Hon'ble National Commission in Satish Chander Madan Vs. Bajaj Allianz General Insurance Co. Ltd. I (2016) CPJ 613 (NC) held that hypertension is common ailment and it can be controlled by medication and it is not necessary that a person suffering from hypertension would always suffer a heart attack. In paras No.8 to 10 it was held as follows:
State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission Cites 3 - Cited by 12 - Full Document
1