Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 5 of 5 (0.20 seconds)
Madan Mohan vs Guru Gobind Soingh Indraprashtha ... on 29 September, 2006 cites

Union Of India & Anr vs Satya Prakash & Ors on 5 April, 2006

30. This plea is also based on wrong legal assumption. The Supreme Court has held that if a reserved category candidate is recommended by the commission without resorting to relaxed standard could not get his/her preference in the merit list, he/she can opt a preference from the reserved category but while computing the quota/ percentage of reservation he/she will be deemed to have been allotted a seat as an open category candidate (i.e on merit) and not as reserved category candidate recommended by the Commission by resorting to the relaxed standards. Reliance can be placed for this on , Union of India and Anr. v. Satya Prakash and Ors. where it was held as under by the Supreme Court:
Supreme Court of India Cites 5 - Cited by 170 - H K Sema - Full Document

Neelu Arora And Anr vs Union Of India And Ors on 24 January, 2002

17. The averment of the petitioner that for B. Tech/M. Tech 0.375 has been rounded off to 1 and 0.525 has been rounded off to 1 which is the reservation out of 15% quota for outside Delhi region was refuted. Reliance was placed on Nellu Arora and Anr. v. Union of India and Ors. to contend that no admission can be made after second counseling. The relevant observation of the Supreme Court as relied on by the respondent No.1 is as under:
Supreme Court of India Cites 1 - Cited by 23 - Full Document
1