Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 4 of 4 (0.27 seconds)

Commissioner Of Income Tax vs Adidas India Marketing (P) Ltd. on 10 July, 2006

" we note that Tribunal has followed the decision of this Court in CIT Vs. Adidas India Marketing (P) Ltd, 288 ITR 379 (Del) in which this Court held that the assessee who was obliged to but had not deducted tax at source, would not have asked to pay the same where dueductee 8 ITA Nos. 434 to 436(Asr)/2011 had paid tax on the amount received by him as his income. The Tribunal further noted that since the deductee is Government of India undertaking, it cannot be presumed that it has not paid tax. We put it to the counsel for the appellant as to whether any notice was issued by the AO to the AAI, so that there is not double taxation, the counsel for the appellant stated that this was not clear from the filed. Similarly, the counsel in reply to the Court query also said that there is nothing on record to suggest that any proceedings have been intimated against AAI for not paying taxes.
Delhi High Court Cites 19 - Cited by 58 - V Sanghi - Full Document
1