Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 34 (0.26 seconds)
Muruganantham vs The Director General Of Police cites

State Of Bihar And Anr vs J.A.C. Saldanha And Ors on 13 November, 1979

According to him, the investigation is being impartially conducted and that it is irresponsible to question the same. He commented on the cryptic nature of the petition which contained hardly three paragraphs. He called upon this Court to ignore the comments made across the bar and in the air. He also relied on the following case laws:- AIR 1945 PC 18 ( King Emperor V. Khwaja Nazir Ahmad), AIR 1968 SC 117 (Abhinandan Jha & Ors. V. Dinesh Mishra and Ors), https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis 9/34 AIR 1970 SC 786 (S.N.Sharma V. Bipen Kumar Tiwari & Ors.), 1980 CriLJ 98 (State of Bihar & Anr. V. J.A.C.Saldanna & Ors.), 1992 CRI.L.J. 527 (State of Haryana and others V. Ch.Bhajan Lal and others), 1994 CriLJ 1981 (Joginder Kumar V. State of U.P. & Ors.), 1995 AIR SCW 2212 (Director, CBI & Ors. v. Niyamavedi rep. By its member K.Nandini, Advocate & Ors), AIR 2002 SC 1856 (P.Ramachandra Rao V. State of Karnataka), 2003 CriLJ 3117 (Union of India V. Prakash P.Hinduja & Anr. (2003) 2 SCC 649 (M.C.Abraham and Anr. V. State of Maharastra and Ors), AIR 2008 SC 1614 (Divine Retreat Centre V. State of Kerala & Ors), 2009 (10) SCC 488 (D.Venkatasubramaniam and Ors. V. M.K.Mohan Krishnamachari and Ors), (2019) 9 SCC 24 (P.Chidambaram V. Directorate of Enforcement), AIR 2020 SC 2386 (Arnab Ranjan Goswami V. Union of India), AIR 2021 SC 1918 (M/s.Neeharika Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd. V. State of Maharashtra).
Supreme Court of India Cites 37 - Cited by 1183 - D A Desai - Full Document

State Of Haryana And Ors vs Ch. Bhajan Lal And Ors on 21 November, 1990

According to him, the investigation is being impartially conducted and that it is irresponsible to question the same. He commented on the cryptic nature of the petition which contained hardly three paragraphs. He called upon this Court to ignore the comments made across the bar and in the air. He also relied on the following case laws:- AIR 1945 PC 18 ( King Emperor V. Khwaja Nazir Ahmad), AIR 1968 SC 117 (Abhinandan Jha & Ors. V. Dinesh Mishra and Ors), https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis 9/34 AIR 1970 SC 786 (S.N.Sharma V. Bipen Kumar Tiwari & Ors.), 1980 CriLJ 98 (State of Bihar & Anr. V. J.A.C.Saldanna & Ors.), 1992 CRI.L.J. 527 (State of Haryana and others V. Ch.Bhajan Lal and others), 1994 CriLJ 1981 (Joginder Kumar V. State of U.P. & Ors.), 1995 AIR SCW 2212 (Director, CBI & Ors. v. Niyamavedi rep. By its member K.Nandini, Advocate & Ors), AIR 2002 SC 1856 (P.Ramachandra Rao V. State of Karnataka), 2003 CriLJ 3117 (Union of India V. Prakash P.Hinduja & Anr. (2003) 2 SCC 649 (M.C.Abraham and Anr. V. State of Maharastra and Ors), AIR 2008 SC 1614 (Divine Retreat Centre V. State of Kerala & Ors), 2009 (10) SCC 488 (D.Venkatasubramaniam and Ors. V. M.K.Mohan Krishnamachari and Ors), (2019) 9 SCC 24 (P.Chidambaram V. Directorate of Enforcement), AIR 2020 SC 2386 (Arnab Ranjan Goswami V. Union of India), AIR 2021 SC 1918 (M/s.Neeharika Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd. V. State of Maharashtra).
Supreme Court of India Cites 44 - Cited by 19733 - S R Pandian - Full Document

Joginder Kumar vs State Of U.P on 25 April, 1994

According to him, the investigation is being impartially conducted and that it is irresponsible to question the same. He commented on the cryptic nature of the petition which contained hardly three paragraphs. He called upon this Court to ignore the comments made across the bar and in the air. He also relied on the following case laws:- AIR 1945 PC 18 ( King Emperor V. Khwaja Nazir Ahmad), AIR 1968 SC 117 (Abhinandan Jha & Ors. V. Dinesh Mishra and Ors), https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis 9/34 AIR 1970 SC 786 (S.N.Sharma V. Bipen Kumar Tiwari & Ors.), 1980 CriLJ 98 (State of Bihar & Anr. V. J.A.C.Saldanna & Ors.), 1992 CRI.L.J. 527 (State of Haryana and others V. Ch.Bhajan Lal and others), 1994 CriLJ 1981 (Joginder Kumar V. State of U.P. & Ors.), 1995 AIR SCW 2212 (Director, CBI & Ors. v. Niyamavedi rep. By its member K.Nandini, Advocate & Ors), AIR 2002 SC 1856 (P.Ramachandra Rao V. State of Karnataka), 2003 CriLJ 3117 (Union of India V. Prakash P.Hinduja & Anr. (2003) 2 SCC 649 (M.C.Abraham and Anr. V. State of Maharastra and Ors), AIR 2008 SC 1614 (Divine Retreat Centre V. State of Kerala & Ors), 2009 (10) SCC 488 (D.Venkatasubramaniam and Ors. V. M.K.Mohan Krishnamachari and Ors), (2019) 9 SCC 24 (P.Chidambaram V. Directorate of Enforcement), AIR 2020 SC 2386 (Arnab Ranjan Goswami V. Union of India), AIR 2021 SC 1918 (M/s.Neeharika Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd. V. State of Maharashtra).
Supreme Court of India Cites 7 - Cited by 5745 - S Mohan - Full Document

Director, Central Bureau Of ... vs Niyamavedi Represented By Its Member K. ... on 5 April, 1995

According to him, the investigation is being impartially conducted and that it is irresponsible to question the same. He commented on the cryptic nature of the petition which contained hardly three paragraphs. He called upon this Court to ignore the comments made across the bar and in the air. He also relied on the following case laws:- AIR 1945 PC 18 ( King Emperor V. Khwaja Nazir Ahmad), AIR 1968 SC 117 (Abhinandan Jha & Ors. V. Dinesh Mishra and Ors), https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis 9/34 AIR 1970 SC 786 (S.N.Sharma V. Bipen Kumar Tiwari & Ors.), 1980 CriLJ 98 (State of Bihar & Anr. V. J.A.C.Saldanna & Ors.), 1992 CRI.L.J. 527 (State of Haryana and others V. Ch.Bhajan Lal and others), 1994 CriLJ 1981 (Joginder Kumar V. State of U.P. & Ors.), 1995 AIR SCW 2212 (Director, CBI & Ors. v. Niyamavedi rep. By its member K.Nandini, Advocate & Ors), AIR 2002 SC 1856 (P.Ramachandra Rao V. State of Karnataka), 2003 CriLJ 3117 (Union of India V. Prakash P.Hinduja & Anr. (2003) 2 SCC 649 (M.C.Abraham and Anr. V. State of Maharastra and Ors), AIR 2008 SC 1614 (Divine Retreat Centre V. State of Kerala & Ors), 2009 (10) SCC 488 (D.Venkatasubramaniam and Ors. V. M.K.Mohan Krishnamachari and Ors), (2019) 9 SCC 24 (P.Chidambaram V. Directorate of Enforcement), AIR 2020 SC 2386 (Arnab Ranjan Goswami V. Union of India), AIR 2021 SC 1918 (M/s.Neeharika Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd. V. State of Maharashtra).
Supreme Court of India Cites 3 - Cited by 36 - S V Manohar - Full Document

P. Ramachandra Rao vs State Of Karnataka on 16 April, 2002

According to him, the investigation is being impartially conducted and that it is irresponsible to question the same. He commented on the cryptic nature of the petition which contained hardly three paragraphs. He called upon this Court to ignore the comments made across the bar and in the air. He also relied on the following case laws:- AIR 1945 PC 18 ( King Emperor V. Khwaja Nazir Ahmad), AIR 1968 SC 117 (Abhinandan Jha & Ors. V. Dinesh Mishra and Ors), https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis 9/34 AIR 1970 SC 786 (S.N.Sharma V. Bipen Kumar Tiwari & Ors.), 1980 CriLJ 98 (State of Bihar & Anr. V. J.A.C.Saldanna & Ors.), 1992 CRI.L.J. 527 (State of Haryana and others V. Ch.Bhajan Lal and others), 1994 CriLJ 1981 (Joginder Kumar V. State of U.P. & Ors.), 1995 AIR SCW 2212 (Director, CBI & Ors. v. Niyamavedi rep. By its member K.Nandini, Advocate & Ors), AIR 2002 SC 1856 (P.Ramachandra Rao V. State of Karnataka), 2003 CriLJ 3117 (Union of India V. Prakash P.Hinduja & Anr. (2003) 2 SCC 649 (M.C.Abraham and Anr. V. State of Maharastra and Ors), AIR 2008 SC 1614 (Divine Retreat Centre V. State of Kerala & Ors), 2009 (10) SCC 488 (D.Venkatasubramaniam and Ors. V. M.K.Mohan Krishnamachari and Ors), (2019) 9 SCC 24 (P.Chidambaram V. Directorate of Enforcement), AIR 2020 SC 2386 (Arnab Ranjan Goswami V. Union of India), AIR 2021 SC 1918 (M/s.Neeharika Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd. V. State of Maharashtra).
Supreme Court of India Cites 31 - Cited by 938 - R C Lahoti - Full Document

Union Of India vs Prakash P. Hinduja & Anr on 7 July, 2003

According to him, the investigation is being impartially conducted and that it is irresponsible to question the same. He commented on the cryptic nature of the petition which contained hardly three paragraphs. He called upon this Court to ignore the comments made across the bar and in the air. He also relied on the following case laws:- AIR 1945 PC 18 ( King Emperor V. Khwaja Nazir Ahmad), AIR 1968 SC 117 (Abhinandan Jha & Ors. V. Dinesh Mishra and Ors), https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis 9/34 AIR 1970 SC 786 (S.N.Sharma V. Bipen Kumar Tiwari & Ors.), 1980 CriLJ 98 (State of Bihar & Anr. V. J.A.C.Saldanna & Ors.), 1992 CRI.L.J. 527 (State of Haryana and others V. Ch.Bhajan Lal and others), 1994 CriLJ 1981 (Joginder Kumar V. State of U.P. & Ors.), 1995 AIR SCW 2212 (Director, CBI & Ors. v. Niyamavedi rep. By its member K.Nandini, Advocate & Ors), AIR 2002 SC 1856 (P.Ramachandra Rao V. State of Karnataka), 2003 CriLJ 3117 (Union of India V. Prakash P.Hinduja & Anr. (2003) 2 SCC 649 (M.C.Abraham and Anr. V. State of Maharastra and Ors), AIR 2008 SC 1614 (Divine Retreat Centre V. State of Kerala & Ors), 2009 (10) SCC 488 (D.Venkatasubramaniam and Ors. V. M.K.Mohan Krishnamachari and Ors), (2019) 9 SCC 24 (P.Chidambaram V. Directorate of Enforcement), AIR 2020 SC 2386 (Arnab Ranjan Goswami V. Union of India), AIR 2021 SC 1918 (M/s.Neeharika Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd. V. State of Maharashtra).
Supreme Court of India Cites 42 - Cited by 418 - G P Mathur - Full Document

Divine Retreat Centre vs State Of Kerala & Ors on 11 March, 2008

According to him, the investigation is being impartially conducted and that it is irresponsible to question the same. He commented on the cryptic nature of the petition which contained hardly three paragraphs. He called upon this Court to ignore the comments made across the bar and in the air. He also relied on the following case laws:- AIR 1945 PC 18 ( King Emperor V. Khwaja Nazir Ahmad), AIR 1968 SC 117 (Abhinandan Jha & Ors. V. Dinesh Mishra and Ors), https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis 9/34 AIR 1970 SC 786 (S.N.Sharma V. Bipen Kumar Tiwari & Ors.), 1980 CriLJ 98 (State of Bihar & Anr. V. J.A.C.Saldanna & Ors.), 1992 CRI.L.J. 527 (State of Haryana and others V. Ch.Bhajan Lal and others), 1994 CriLJ 1981 (Joginder Kumar V. State of U.P. & Ors.), 1995 AIR SCW 2212 (Director, CBI & Ors. v. Niyamavedi rep. By its member K.Nandini, Advocate & Ors), AIR 2002 SC 1856 (P.Ramachandra Rao V. State of Karnataka), 2003 CriLJ 3117 (Union of India V. Prakash P.Hinduja & Anr. (2003) 2 SCC 649 (M.C.Abraham and Anr. V. State of Maharastra and Ors), AIR 2008 SC 1614 (Divine Retreat Centre V. State of Kerala & Ors), 2009 (10) SCC 488 (D.Venkatasubramaniam and Ors. V. M.K.Mohan Krishnamachari and Ors), (2019) 9 SCC 24 (P.Chidambaram V. Directorate of Enforcement), AIR 2020 SC 2386 (Arnab Ranjan Goswami V. Union of India), AIR 2021 SC 1918 (M/s.Neeharika Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd. V. State of Maharashtra).
Supreme Court of India Cites 49 - Cited by 665 - B S Reddy - Full Document
1   2 3 4 Next