Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 21 (0.32 seconds)
Acit(Central)-2, Bhopal, Bhopal vs Pramada Estates India Private Limited, ... on 31 July, 2024
cites
Section 68 in The Income Tax Act, 1961 [Entire Act]
Section 133A in The Income Tax Act, 1961 [Entire Act]
The Income Tax Act, 1961
Section 34 in The Income Tax Act, 1961 [Entire Act]
Dheeraj Lal Harilal Andharia vs Chief Commissioner Of Income Tax (Cca) , ... on 10 June, 2019
Similar views have been
expressed by Apex court in the case of Dhiraj Lal Girdharilal v/s CIT (1954)
26 ITR 736 (SC). As per law, tax has to be assessed on real income basis and
not on income computed as per the whims and fancies of the A.O without
having any corroborative evidence in support. In the instant case, the initial
onus was solely on the ld AO to establish that the alleged amount was actually
received by appellant, which the ld AO has utterly failed to do. It is also
important to mention that a search was carried out on the premises of the
appellant and during the course of search no evidence was found regarding
receipt of alleged unaccounted money by the appellant. Thus, there existed no
locus standi with the ld AO to made additions in the hands of appellant dehors
without positive, concrete and direct evidence qua the alleged unaccounted
money.
Section 34 in The Indian Evidence Act, 1872 [Entire Act]
Section 132 in The Income Tax Act, 1961 [Entire Act]
Sh. S.K. Gupta, New Delhi vs Dcit, New Delhi on 27 April, 2023
(v) S K Gupta Vs. DCIT (1999) 63 TTJ (Del.Trib) 532
Held that
Jagdamba Silk Mills , Mumbai vs Acit-18(1), Mumbai , Mumbai on 8 November, 2021
(vi) Jagdamba Rice Mills Vs. ACIT (2000) 67 TTJ (Chd) 838
Held that
"No addition can be made on dumb documents".