Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 22 (0.27 seconds)
Cascade Energy Pvt Ltd vs The State Of Tamil Nadu on 22 February, 2021 cites

State Of Haryana And Ors vs Ch. Bhajan Lal And Ors on 21 November, 1990

17. Incidentally, the Serious Fraud Investigation Office has also commenced investigation against Rohit Rabindranath's [A1] group of companies, which is, of course the subject matter of the dispute in this petition (Crl.O.P.No.11819 of 2018). While painting a rosy picture about Zynergy, Rohit Rabindranath [A1] appears to have submitted an one page valuation report of Grant Thornton India LLP about Zynergy to Cascade. Investigation conducted by the CCB with Grant Thornton India LLP shows that they had not given an one page report, but, had given a 43 page Valuation https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/ Report about Zynergy. This prima facie shows that 8 Crl.OP No.591 of 2021 there was deception at inception, inasmuch as a truncated Valuation Report favourable to Rohit Rabindranath [A1] has been shown to Cascade in order to convince them to invest. After obtaining the investment of Rs.33 crores, Rohit Rabindranath [A1] has been playing every trick under the sun denying Cascade the fruits of their investment. The material collected by the police so far thus shows the commission of a cognizable offence and on account of the stay granted by this Court, further progress in investigation had come to a grinding halt. Applying the test laid down in State of Haryana v. Bhajan Lal [AIR 1992 SC 604] and State of Bihar Vs. P.P.Sharma [AIR 1991 SC 1260], the impugned FIR cannot be quashed at the threshold.
Supreme Court of India Cites 44 - Cited by 19733 - S R Pandian - Full Document
1   2 3 Next