cites: 158731462

High Court Of Punjab & Haryana vs Jagdev Singh on 29 July, 2016

22. Therefore, taking into consideration these clear facts of this case as well the law laid down in the cases of Jagdev Singh (supra), Ananda Vikram Baviskar (supra) and Writ Petition No. 4919 of 2018, (supra), these Petitioners are not entitled to any relief as claimed.

Supreme Court of India Cites 1 - Cited by 921 - D Y Chandrachud - Full Document

Article 226 in Constitution of India [Constitution]

Constitution Article Cites 5 - Cited by 1058585

State Of Punjab & Ors vs Rafiq Masih (White Washer) on 18 December, 2014

"7. Our Courts are dealing with hundreds of such cases. On each day, we have at least one such case before us. Considering the law laid down in Rafiq Masih (Supra), our Courts (( 12 )) WP-6422-2019 have been quashing notices for recovery on the ground that such notices have been issued long after the retirement of an employee and especially in the cases of Class-IV employees, who would find it difficult to shell out large sums of money towards recovery/payment. Consequentially, we have pardoned several Class-IV employees and protected them as against recovery.

Supreme Court of India Cites 15 - Cited by 7379 - J S Khehar - Full Document

Jayshree Trimbak Takalkar vs The Chief Executive Officer Zp ... on 22 December, 2017

Smt. Jayshree Trimbak Takalkar Vs. The Chief Executive Officer, Zilla Parishad, Aurangabad and another; iii. Judgment Dt. 15.11.2021 passed in WP No.7379 of 2020 -

Bombay High Court Cites 15 - Cited by 0 - V V Kankanwadi - Full Document

State Of Maharashtra And Ors. vs Sureshchandra Khushalchand Bakliwal ... on 10 March, 2003

9. This Court at the Nagpur Bench has dealt with Writ Petition No.4919 of 2018 filed by the State of Maharashtra and Others Vs. Sureshchandra S/o. Dharamchand Jain and Others for challenging the judgment of the learned Maharashtra Administrative Tribunal, Nagpur Bench dated 18.04.2017.

Bombay High Court Cites 11 - Cited by 1 - B H Marlapalle - Full Document

Ananda Vikram Baviskar vs The State Of Maharashtra And Others on 1 September, 2021

22. Therefore, taking into consideration these clear facts of this case as well the law laid down in the cases of Jagdev Singh (supra), Ananda Vikram Baviskar (supra) and Writ Petition No. 4919 of 2018, (supra), these Petitioners are not entitled to any relief as claimed.

Bombay High Court Cites 3 - Cited by 3 - R V Ghuge - Full Document

Pramila Manohar Pawar vs The State Of Maharashtra And Others on 6 September, 2021

Smt. Pramila Manohar Pawar Vs. The State of Maharashtra and others and iv. Ananda Vikram Baviskar Vs. State of Maharashtra and others - 2022(2) Mh.L.J. 698.

Bombay High Court Cites 0 - Cited by 0 - S G Mehare - Full Document

Search Results Page

Refine Search

Search Results