Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 8 of 8 (0.19 seconds)
Munni @ Gulab Kaur And Another vs Baljinder Singh And Another on 20 April, 2026 cites

Basanti Devi vs Divisional Manager The New India ... on 6 December, 2021

In Basanti Devi's (supra), the age of the deceased at the time of the accident, which took place on 10.03.2011, was 25 years and the deceased was Bachelor of Engineering in Computer Technology. Under these circumstances, the Apex Court, while setting aside the decision of the High Court in reducing the compensation, restored the award of the Tribunal in assessing the potential income of the deceased as Rs.20,000/- per month.
Supreme Court - Daily Orders Cites 1 - Cited by 17 - Full Document

National Insurance Co. Ltd vs Pranay Sethi on 31 October, 2017

14. Per contra, learned counsel for respondent No.2-Insurance Company, submits that there is no illegality in the impugned award passed by the MACT. It is further argued that though the deceased was possessing the aforesaid qualification yet the fact remains that as on the date of the accident, she was unemployed and therefore, the MACT rightly assessed her notional income as Rs.10,000/-. He however, does not dispute the ratio laid down by the Apex Court in Pranay Sethi's case (supra) and Sarla Verma's case (supra) as regards the consortium.
Supreme Court of India Cites 32 - Cited by 9815 - D Misra - Full Document
1