Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 28 (0.32 seconds)Article 14 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
G.Rama Mohan Rao & Anr vs The Government Of Andhra Pradesh, Rep, ... on 7 March, 2017
Learned Standing Counsel for APSRTC would contend that in
view of the judgment of Division Bench in "G.Rama Mohan Rao v.
Government of Andhra Pradesh" (referred supra), confirmed by the
Apex Court, the petitioners are disentitled to claim the benefits.
Irrigation Development Employees ... vs Government Of A.P. And Ors. on 16 March, 2004
(Vide: Irrigation Development Employees
Association v. Govt. of A.P. (referred supra) and "State of Punjab
v. Ram Lubhaya Bagga18; "Narmada Bachao Andolan v. Union
of India19 and "Union of India v. Tejram Parashramji
Bombhate20").
Article 16 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
Section 6 in Telangana Public Employment (Regulation of Age of Superannuation) Act, 1984 [Entire Act]
Section 3 in Telangana Public Employment (Regulation of Age of Superannuation) Act, 1984 [Entire Act]
Article 226 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
Article 300A in Constitution of India [Constitution]
State Of Rajasthan & Anr vs C.P. Singh & Ors on 4 April, 2014
"The question which arises for consideration in these Writ Petitions is
whether the 1984 Act, and the amendment made thereto by the 2014 State
Act, are applicable to employees of Public Sector Undertakings. No such
question arose for consideration in C.P. Singh (supra). It is only if the
concerned public sector undertakings, had amended their rules/bye-laws
making the provisions of the 2014 State Act applicable to its employees,
would the age of retirement of employees of these legal entities have stood
extended to 60 years. It is also not as if employees of these PSUs were asked
to exercise their option, and they had chosen to be governed by the 2014
State Act. Even otherwise neither the 1984 Act nor the 2014 State Act
provide for the exercise of options by employees of PSUs.