Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 37 (0.30 seconds)

Union Of India vs K.A. Najeeb on 1 February, 2021

13. A three judge Bench of the Supreme Court in Union of India v. K.A Najeeb (2021) 3 SCC 713 while dealing with an appeal against an order rejecting bail of an accused who was inter alia charged with Sections 16, 18, 18-B, 19 and 20 of the UAPA, emphasised the need to balance the said considerations. More importantly, it further observed that a Constitutional Court is not strictly bound by the prohibitory provisions of grant of bail under UAPA and can exercise its constitutional jurisdiction to release an accused on bail who has been incarcerated for a long period of time. The relevant paragraphs of the judgement are read as under:
Supreme Court of India Cites 18 - Cited by 1436 - S Kant - Full Document

Javed Gulam Nabi Shaikh vs The State Of Maharashtra on 8 February, 2023

15. Similarly in Javed Gulam Nabi Shaikh v. State of Maharashtra and Anr., 2024 SCC OnLine SC 1693 the Supreme Court observed as under "19. If the State or any prosecuting agency including the Court concerned has no wherewithal to provide or protect the fundamental right of an accused to have a speedy trial as enshrined under Article 21 of the Constitution then the State or any other prosecuting agency should not oppose the plea for bail on the ground that the crime committed is serious. Article 21 of the Constitution applies irrespective of the nature of the crime."
Bombay High Court Cites 0 - Cited by 0 - M S Karnik - Full Document
1   2 3 4 Next